PEMBELAAN DIRI ADVOKAT TERDAKWA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI E-KTP DARI SEGI PANDANG UU NO 18 TAHUN 2003 DAN UU NO 31 TAHUN 1999
Abstract
Corruption is one of the things that is very detrimental to the state's
finances and will slowly destroy the country. various corruption acts ranging
from corruption directly take state money there is also corruption indirectly
where the action is still detrimental to the state. one example of indirect
corruption is the act of frederich yunadi. started from the virtue of the
defendant's mistaken case of corruption The e-ktp project setya novanto from the
KPK call which eventually dragged its legal counsel also frederich yunadi
become a suspect because it is considered obstructing the process of examination
of the suspect of corruption. Because it was designated a suspect Frederich
yunadi then asked for protection of immunity rights advocate as stated in the law
advocate article 16 to protect all his actions in defending his client.
The formulation of the problem in this research is about whether the action of
advocate Frederich Yunadi who was prosecuted to obstruction of justice article
21 of TPK law can be protected the right of immunity article 16 law advocate.
This research uses normative juridical approach. Materials used include primary
legal materials and secondary legal entities. Furthermore, the analysis is done by
deduction method. Based on the results of research and discussion, it is
concluded that the actions of Frederich Yunadi which obstruct the process of
examination of suspects of corruption can not be protected by the right of
immunity article 16 law advocate. it is advisable for advocates to carry out their
duties in accordance with applicable law