• English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
  • English 
    • English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Faculty of Law
  • Law
  • Theses (Law)
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Faculty of Law
  • Law
  • Theses (Law)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

PROBLEMATIKA ATAS PEROLEHAN HAK GUNA BANGUNAN DENGAN LUNASNYA KREDIT PEMILIKAN RUMAH PADA REAL ESTATE Z SURABAYA

Thumbnail
View/Open
Sampul.pdf (1.066Mb)
Abstract.pdf (82.96Kb)
Abstrak.pdf (75.88Kb)
Bab-1.pdf (186.4Kb)
Bab-2.pdf (247.8Kb)
Bab-3.pdf (143.4Kb)
Bab-4.pdf (69.86Kb)
Pustaka.pdf (110.6Kb)
Date
2019-12-13
Author
INDRADEWI, ASTRID ATHINA
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Since the beginning of time, housing has been one of the most important basic human needs. These years, real-estate and property businesses are thriving more than ever. The increase of housing demands while catering to limited land plots has created a challenge for people to find strategic places. Surabaya is no exception. Majority of consumers choose to buy homes with house loan installments instead of paying in cash. In this transaction, there are several parties which cannot be separated: Consumer, Developer, and the Bank. But with the thriving demand of the housing industry, it comes with many legal disputes. One of them is the difficulty to receive official house certificate from the Developer party. The purpose of this research is to understand whether Bank X is responsible if the house loan installment has been paid off and the official house certificate has not been submitted to the consumer. The second purpose is to find out a legal solution in regards of incomplete house certificate, even though consumer already fulfilled their payment of the house loan. The type of research used is Doctrinal, which means conducting a literature study using various legal theories and also regulations. The result of this research indicate that Bank X is not responsible because the bank itself already fulfilled its responsibility by giving the house loan to the consumer. It was also shown in the Credit Agreement that consumer has agreed not to sue the Bank if the Developer has not fulfilled the obligations in regard of the official house certificate. The second result was that there are two legal solutions in regard of the house certificate settlement. The legal solution offered is resolved by deliberation and the second is carried out by arbitration
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1680
Collections
  • Theses (Law)

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV