KONTRADIKSI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA UTARA DENGAN BADAN ARBITRASE NASIONAL INDONESIA TERKAIT SEA WORLD

Abstract

Cooperation agreement has become a necessity for society, due to the ever tightening competition within the world of business. The increasing land price from year to year has made people to prefer a lease or cooperation rather than investing money to buy a plot of land. The other purpose to establish a cooperation is to strengthen the seed to avoid the competitor of the same type of work. This research is aimed to find out whether the cooperation agreement procedure conducted by Sea World with PT Jaya Ancol, is applying the proper Indonesian law in practice. This research is also aimed to shed understanding for readers on the legal position of businesses in contracts with other countries may have alternative dispute resolution in the event of a problem. The research method being used is juridical normative, namely the search for a settlement of the problem by researching and reviewing the positive legal norms by studying literature. The result of this research has shown that the perpetrators of the contract has violated the principle of freedom of contract, and has conducted a resolution of disputes that are not in accordance with the law and deviated the Indonesian National Arbitration Board.