• English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
  • English 
    • English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Faculty of Law
  • Law
  • Final Project (Law)
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Faculty of Law
  • Law
  • Final Project (Law)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

PERBUATAN BERLANJUT DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI TERKAIT PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 995 K/PID/2006

Thumbnail
View/Open
1.SAMPUL.pdf (1.005Mb)
2.ABSTRAK.pdf (10.42Kb)
3.BAB I.pdf (31.71Kb)
4.BAB II.pdf (188.9Kb)
5.BAB III.pdf (39.81Kb)
6.BAB IV.pdf (78.73Kb)
7.DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf (8.712Kb)
8.LAMPIRAN.pdf (988.1Kb)
Date
2013-01-14
Author
RAHMANI, IMANUEL
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Corruption is the biggest enemy for our nation nowadays. A lot of promises had been given by the government to throw away the parasite that has been destroying the wealth and the health of this nation. So many excuses had beed said and so many efforts had been done to erase this criminal act that has been giving bad impacts for the economical side of this country. The Act Number 31 0f 1999 that had been changed with the Act Number 20 of 2001 on Corruption is the main weapon for law enforcement officers to destroy corruption. But still there are some differentiations toward the interpretations and implementations of this law enforcement. Even in the main regulation of Criminal Law, the Indonesian Book of Criminal Law (KUHP), there are still some differentiations toward the interpretations and implementations of the articles. For example, those differentiations could be seen in interpretations and implementations of the article 64 (1) KUHP about voorgezette handeling. So that, this main regulation of Criminal Law could hardly reach its aim to interpret the article in its connections with the implementation of this article towards the “special” Criminal Law, like corruption. Based on that background, so it could be formulated as the main problem are there any unsure of voorgezette handeling in the corruption, using the point of view of the Case Result of the Supreme Court Number 995/K/PID/2006 juncto Number 996/K/PID/2006 in the Corruption Act towards Nazaruddin Sjamsuddin as the Chiel of the Election Committee (KPU) and Hamdani Amin as the public officer/ Chief Department. And the aims of this research is to comprehend the meaning and unsure of voorgezette handeling and to know the existence of voorgezette handeling in the corruption. The method that is used in this final paper is normative jurisdiction, which means a research that based on the regulations and literature relevant with the case discussed in this paper.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/458
Collections
  • Final Project (Law)

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV