• English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
  • English 
    • English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Faculty of Creative Industry
  • Industrial Engineering
  • Final Project (IE)
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Faculty of Creative Industry
  • Industrial Engineering
  • Final Project (IE)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

APLIKASI METODE SIMULATED ANNEALING PADA PERBAIKAN TATA LETAK BERDASARKAN KONSEP GROUP TECHNOLOGY: STUDI KASUS PADA PERUSAHAAN SEPEDA

Thumbnail
View/Open
Sampul+Abstrak.PDF (281.1Kb)
Bab 1.PDF (87.86Kb)
Bab 2.PDF (954.3Kb)
Bab 3.PDF (1.274Mb)
Bab 4.PDF (2.013Mb)
Penutup.PDF (58.85Kb)
Pustaka.PDF (97.44Kb)
Lampiran A.PDF (1.068Mb)
Lampiran B.PDF (785.1Kb)
Lampiran C.PDF (308.9Kb)
Lampiran D.PDF (328.1Kb)
Date
2012-01-09
Author
WIRHASPATI, NOVIA LISTIYANI
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This research proposes a facility layout improvement in Material Division in a bicycle company. This is due to the inefficient placement of new machines and thus, can affect efficiency in material handling. Layout improvement is being held with Systematic Layout Procedure (SLP) as the framework, based on group technology concept to improve efficiency in production system with high level of product variation. There are several stages conducted in this research. In cycle time research, a comprehensive time study is being held. In machine grouping, similarity coefficient method is conducted, in which the writer uses three different coefficients: Jaccard, Ochiai, and Kulczynski. To predict the area of cells, linear regression method is used. In the macro development stage, a regular Simulated Annealing (SA) and Multi Objective Simulated Annealing (MOSA) are implemented. In the end, there are five proposed layouts with a better score for machine grouping criteria compared to the original layout (grouping efficiency = 0.66; grouping efficacy = 0.24). Proposed layout 1, 2, and 3 are the best layout for machine grouping criteria (grouping efficiency = 0.80; grouping efficacy = 0.51). Proposed layout 1 is the best layout for material flow criteria (material flow/week = 45,713.28 times.cm). Proposed layout from the supervisor is the best layout for movement criteria (movement = 558.12 cm). Proposed layout 2 is the best layout for unity criteria (unity = 152.29 cm). However, if performance of each proposed layout is ranked and scored, proposed layout 2 and 4 are the two layouts with the highest mean of rank weight (rank weight for proposed layout 2 = 0.78; rank weight for proposed layout 4 = 0.67).
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/483
Collections
  • Final Project (IE)

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV