• English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
  • English 
    • English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Faculty of Creative Industry
  • Industrial Engineering
  • Final Project (IE)
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Faculty of Creative Industry
  • Industrial Engineering
  • Final Project (IE)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

ANALISIS KESELAMATAN DAN KESEHATAN KERJA PADA PT. ANUGRAHA MACHINERY INDONESIA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, RISK ASSESSMENT, AND RISK CONTROL (HIRARC), FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS (FMEA) DAN FAULT TREE ANALYSIS (FTA)

Thumbnail
View/Open
Sampul (2).pdf (3.193Mb)
Abstract.pdf (418.6Kb)
BAB 1.pdf (103.9Kb)
BAB 2.pdf (600.4Kb)
BAB 3.pdf (106.6Kb)
BAB 4.pdf (3.569Mb)
Penutup.pdf (93.78Kb)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf (190.3Kb)
LAMPIRAN .pdf (232.8Kb)
Date
2016-08-22
Author
FERNANDO, NICKO
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This research is performed on PT. Anugraha Machinery Indonesia (AMI). AMI is Company is engaged in the sale and purchase of wood machines with premium quality. In this research, researchers will investigate the Occupational Health and Safety aspect which the company has never been analyzed related aspect before and the procedure for using personal protective equipment is not clear enough. The main purpose of this study is analyze occupational health and safety that focus on six job using HIRARC, FMEA, and FTA method. This research is focus on six job that considered has the highest risk in companies. The hazards will be identified, the next step is to determind risk level with risk assessment on HIRARC method and measure RPN on FMEA method. The result of each methods will be be compared. Based on the comparison result, researchers will find out the root cause of each failure mode with FTA method and ends with HMP risk control. Based on this result of risk assessment on HIRARC method and RPN on FMEA method, each method acquired 10 hazards with the hihest risk and should be prioritized. Affected by burns during the welding process (5C) had the highest risk that obtained by using risk assessement (HIRARC) method and eyes damaged during the welding process had the highest risk on FMEA method with 252 risk priority number.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/984
Collections
  • Final Project (IE)

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV